Drew Brees is ‘livid’ about franchise tag

Being unable to sign your franchise QB would seem like a big deal, but the New Orleans Saints do have other concerns right now. However, Drew Brees is none to pleased with the franchise tag being placed on him, and has absolutely no plans on signing off on it.

A report from Larry Holder of CBS Sports via WIST-AM in New Orleans say that “Brees is livid” about the organization placing the franchise tag on him and not working out a new deal. The radio station is sourcing individuals in Brees’ inner circle that the All-Pro will not sign the franchise tag deal. What that means is that Brees will holdout of camp if a deal on a new contract is not reached by July 15th.

Reports out of New Orleans are that Brees and the Saints were about $5 million per year apart prior to the team placing the tag on him. Couple this with GM Mickey Loomis calling Brees only ‘very good’. Loomis has since said that he believes that Brees is, in fact, a great player.

With all the chaos going on in NOLA, the Saints cannot afford to let Brees walkaway. All the power would seem to be with Brees at this time. The team is about to possibly lose their coach for multiple games this season, and it is thought that draft picks will also be part of punishments from Roger Goodell’s office. This really isn’t the time for the Saints to mess around. Drew Brees has a lot left in the tank and is still the franchise. This is when owner Tom Benson needs to just open up the checkbook and say “how much?”

  • knightwhosaysni

    I’d be pissed too if I only made 14 million this year.

    /rolls eyes

  • cabbage


    Nails nailed.

    Some people just think they’re above the law.


  • cabbage

    I can see him holding out at the start of training camp, but he seems to classy to take it to the point of hurting his team. So, without a new contract, he becomes a free agent at the end of next season, right?

  • http://thevictoryformation.com Dave K

    cabbage, correct. but if he signs the franchise tag, i believe they technically could use it next year as well. I think you can use it twice on a player. someone feel free to correct me if i am wrong. otherwise, yes, he would be a FA just like he would be this year if he wasn’t franchised.

  • http://thevictoryformation.com Dave K

    i feel like patting myself on the back.

  • http://www.thevictoryformation.com Big D

    i feel like patting myself on the back.

    5-for-5? Nicely done. As a Yankees fan, you probably shouldn’t get too used to seeing those kind of numbers for a while…

  • http://www.thevictoryformation.com Mark Mizerle06

    As a Yankees beisbol fan, you probably shouldn’t get too used to seeing those kind of numbers for a while…

    fixed. cause 2-for-5 is way more common in beisbol.